An Algorithm for the Class of Pure Implicational Formulas
نویسندگان
چکیده
Heusch introduced the notion of pure implicational formulas. He showed that the falsiiability problem for pure implicational formulas with k negations is solvable in time O(n k). Such falsiiability results are easily transformed to satissability results on CNF formulas. We show that the falsiiability problem for pure implicational formulas is solvable in time O(k k n 2), which is polynomial for a xed k. Thus this problem is xed-parameter tractable.
منابع مشابه
Complexity Results of Subclasses of the Pure Implicational Calculus
About 50 years ago Lukasiewicz, Tarski, see 6, 4] and others studied the implicational calculus, i. e. the set PIF (pure implicational formulas) of those propositional formulas that are constructed exclusively from Boolean variables and the propositional implication ! as the only connective. Obviously this class of formulas is not able to represent all Boolean functions. While every formula in ...
متن کاملProof complexity of intuitionistic implicational formulas
We study implicational formulas in the context of proof complexity of intuitionistic propositional logic (IPC). On the one hand, we give an efficient transformation of tautologies to implicational tautologies that preserves the lengths of intuitionistic extended Frege (EF ) or substitution Frege (SF ) proofs up to a polynomial. On the other hand, EF proofs in the implicational fragment of IPC p...
متن کاملHow Many Times Do We Need an Assumption to Prove a Tautology in Minimal Logic: An Example on the Compression Power of Classical Reasoning
In this article we present a class of formulas φn, n ∈ Nat, that need at least 2 assumption occurrences to be proved in a normal proof in Natural Deduction for purely implicational minimal propositional logic. In purely implicational classical propositional logic, with Peirce’s rule, each φn is proved with only one assumption occurrence in Natural Deduction in a normal proof. Besides that, the ...
متن کاملHow many times do we need and assumption ?
In this article we present a class of formulas φn, n ∈ Nat, that need at least 2 assumptions to be proved in a normal proof in Natural Deduction for purely implicational minimal propositional logic. In purely implicational classical propositional logic, with Peirce’s rule, each φn is proved with only one assumption in Natural Deduction in a normal proof. Hence, the formulas φn have exponentiall...
متن کاملStudying provability in implicational intuitionistic logic the formula tree approach
We use an alternative graphical representation for formulas in implicational intuitionistic logic in order to obtain and demonstrate results concerning provability. We demonstrate the adequateness of the method in this area, showing that one can easily recognize and prove new results and simplify the proofs of others. As such, we extend a known class of formulas for which uniqueness of -normal ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Discrete Applied Mathematics
دوره 96-97 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1999